UNTRADITIONAL METHODS IN ANALYSIS OF PROSE WORKS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FOREIGN EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS FOR UZBEKISTAN SCHOOLS
Authors
Sarvinoz Khasanova, R.B. Rasulova ()Files
Abstract
This article provides a comparative analysis of non-traditional methods used in teaching prose works in schools in the USA, Singapore, Japan, China and Finland. The methodological approaches, advantages and limitations of the five countries are considered, and methodological lessons that can be applied to grades 5–7 of general education schools in Uzbekistan are substantiated.
References
Details
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Omega Journal of Linguistics and Language Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
