THE IMPORTANCE OF INTERACTIVE METHODS IN TEACHING THE TOPIC OF GEOMETRIC PROGRESSION IN SCHOOL MATHEMATICS
Authors
Urinboyeva Lolakhon Uktamovna, Nortojiyeva Bahor Oybek qizi, Abdulazizova Dilafro‘z Abdulaziz qizi ()Files
Abstract
This article examines the methodological aspects of using interactive methods in teaching the topic of geometric progression. in school mathematics. The methods of increasing students’ interest and activity in science through organizing a lesson using problem-based learning, cooperative learning, project methods and digital tools, as well as the didactic significance of these methods, are discussed in detail. Also, analysis and practical considerations are given on the adaptation of international pedagogical experience to the educational environment of Uzbekistan and its application in the national context.
References
1. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2020). Law “On Education”. Tashkent: Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (https://lex.uz/ru/docs/5013009).
2. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2022). Resolution No. PQ-133 “On additional measures for the development of the sphere of public education”. (https://president.uz/uz/lists/view/5021).
3. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. — 230 p.
4. Algebra and Mathematical Analysis. (2019). 9th grade textbook. Tashkent: Republican Education Center. — 256 p.
5. Barrows, H.S. (1980). Problem-Based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer. — 206 p.
6. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1994). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. 4th edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. — 284 p.
7. Aronson, E. (1978). The Jigsaw Classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. — 167 p.
8. Thomas, J.W. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation. (http://www.bobpearlman.org/BestPractices/PBL_Research.pdf)
9. Hohenwarter, M., & Jones, K. (2007). Ways of linking geometry and algebra: the case of GeoGebra. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 27(3), 126–131. (https://www.geogebra.org)
10. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? — A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025–3034. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.377. (https://kahoot.com)
11. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM. — 402 p. (https://www.nctm.org/standards)
Details
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Omega Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
